DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo C30 vs 2012 Citroen C4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C30SpecificationCitroen C4
VolvoMakeCitroen
C30ModelC4
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeMinivan, MPV
5Seats7
3Doors5

Performance

Volvo C30SpecificationCitroen C4
9,4 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque340 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C30SpecificationCitroen C4
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C30SpecificationCitroen C4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C30SpecificationCitroen C4
4266 mmLength4590 mm
1782 mmWidth1830 mm
1447 mmHeight1660-1710 mm
1450 KgWeight1613 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2728 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo C30 and 2012 Citroen C4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…