2010 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.0 D3 (150 Hp) 2010Overall Score64.75/100
2010 Volvo C30 vs 2010 Toyota RAV4 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Toyota
RAV4
Toyota RAV4 2.2 D-4D (150 Hp) 2010Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Toyota RAV4
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C30SpecificationToyota RAV4
VolvoMakeToyota
C30ModelRAV4
2010Model year2010
CoupeBody typeSUV
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Volvo C30SpecificationToyota RAV4
9,4 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2231 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque340 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C30SpecificationToyota RAV4
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo C30SpecificationToyota RAV4
4266 mmLength4415 mm
1782 mmWidth1815 mm
1447 mmHeight1720 mm
1450 KgWeight1670 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2560 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Volvo C30 and 2010 Toyota RAV4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…