DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo C30 vs 2010 FAW Bora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Bora

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C30SpecificationFAW Bora
VolvoMakeFAW
C30ModelBora
2010Model year2010
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

Volvo C30SpecificationFAW Bora
9,4 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed216 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque210 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C30SpecificationFAW Bora
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C30SpecificationFAW Bora
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C30SpecificationFAW Bora
4266 mmLength4376 mm
1782 mmWidth1735 mm
1447 mmHeight1446 mm
1450 KgWeight1380 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo C30 and 2010 FAW Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Bora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…