2009 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 1.8 i 16V (125) 2009Overall Score59.5/100
2009 Volvo C30 vs 2009 Mazda MX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Mazda
MX-5
Mazda MX-5 1.8 (126 Hp) 2009Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Mazda MX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda MX-5
VolvoMakeMazda
C30ModelMX-5
2009Model year2009
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
3Doors2
Performance
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda MX-5
11,8 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
200 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
125 HPPower126 HP
165 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda MX-5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda MX-5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda MX-5
4252 mmLength4020 mm
1782 mmWidth1720 mm
1447 mmHeight—
1279 KgWeight1075 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2330 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Volvo C30 and 2009 Mazda MX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…