DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mazda MX-5 vs 2009 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo C30
MazdaMakeVolvo
MX-5ModelC30
2009Model year2009
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo C30
9,9 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
194 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
126 HPPower125 HP
167 NmTorque165 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo C30
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo C30
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo C30
4020 mmLength4252 mm
1720 mmWidth1782 mm
—Height1447 mm
1075 KgWeight1279 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mazda MX-5 and 2009 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…