DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Volvo C30 vs 2008 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C30

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C30SpecificationCitroen C3
VolvoMakeCitroen
C30ModelC3
2008Model year2008
CoupeBody typeKombi, MPV
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Volvo C30SpecificationCitroen C3
11,8 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
185 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
100 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C30SpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption4,9 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
7 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C30SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C30SpecificationCitroen C3
4252 mmLength4078 mm
1782 mmWidth1766 mm
1447 mmHeight1669-1672 mm
1279 KgWeight1277 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Volvo C30 and 2008 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…