DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Citroen C3 vs 2008 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C30

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo C30
CitroenMakeVolvo
C3ModelC30
2008Model year2008
Kombi, MPVBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo C30
13,4 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
173 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
90 HPPower100 HP
215 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo C30
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo C30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo C30
4078 mmLength4252 mm
1766 mmWidth1782 mm
1669-1672 mmHeight1447 mm
1277 KgWeight1279 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Citroen C3 and 2008 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…