DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Volvo 960 vs 1991 Mazda MPV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo 960SpecificationMazda MPV
VolvoMakeMazda
960ModelMPV
1991Model year1991
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo 960SpecificationMazda MPV
9,1 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2922 ccEngine displacement2954 cc
204 HPPower154 HP
267 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo 960SpecificationMazda MPV
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank74 lt
16,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,1 ltAverage consumption11,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo 960SpecificationMazda MPV
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15 VTyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo 960SpecificationMazda MPV
4871 mmLength4465 mm
1750 mmWidth1826 mm
1411 mmHeight1694 mm
1600 KgWeight1831 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Volvo 960 and 1991 Mazda MPV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…