DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Mazda MPV vs 1991 Volvo 960 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo 960
MazdaMakeVolvo
MPVModel960
1991Model year1991
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo 960
—0–100 km/h9,1 s
170 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement2922 cc
154 HPPower204 HP
230 NmTorque267 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo 960
PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption16,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
11,7 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo 960
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo 960
4465 mmLength4871 mm
1826 mmWidth1750 mm
1694 mmHeight1411 mm
1831 KgWeight1600 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Mazda MPV and 1991 Volvo 960 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…