DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Volvo 960 vs 1996 BMW 7 Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeBMW
960Model7 Serisi
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
210 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2473 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
170 HPPower143 HP
230 NmTorque280 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank85 lt
—Urban consumption11,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 VTyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4871 mmLength4984 mm
1750 mmWidth1862 mm
1411 mmHeight1435 mm
1600 KgWeight1710 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2930 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Volvo 960 and 1996 BMW 7 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…