DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 BMW 7 Serisi vs 1996 Volvo 960 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeVolvo
7 SerisiModel960
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
206 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2473 cc
143 HPPower170 HP
280 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,0 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,0 ltAverage consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4984 mmLength4871 mm
1862 mmWidth1750 mm
1435 mmHeight1411 mm
1710 KgWeight1600 Kg
2930 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 BMW 7 Serisi and 1996 Volvo 960 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…