DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Volvo 960 vs 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeChevrolet
960ModelCavalier
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2383 ccEngine displacement2392 cc
115 HPPower152 HP
225 NmTorque203 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank58 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4871 mmLength4580 mm
1750 mmWidth1712 mm
1411 mmHeight1369 mm
1600 KgWeight1287 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2645 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Volvo 960 and 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…