DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Chevrolet Cavalier vs 1996 Volvo 960 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeVolvo
CavalierModel960
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2392 ccEngine displacement2383 cc
152 HPPower115 HP
203 NmTorque225 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
195/65 R15 STyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4580 mmLength4871 mm
1712 mmWidth1750 mm
1369 mmHeight1411 mm
1287 KgWeight1600 Kg
2645 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Chevrolet Cavalier and 1996 Volvo 960 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…