DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Volvo 960 vs 1996 Volvo V70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo 960SpecificationVolvo V70
VolvoMakeVolvo
960ModelV70
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo 960SpecificationVolvo V70
—0–100 km/h7,8 s
210 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
190 HPPower225 HP
280 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo 960SpecificationVolvo V70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
15 ltUrban consumption16,2 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo 960SpecificationVolvo V70
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo 960SpecificationVolvo V70
4871 mmLength4730 mm
1750 mmWidth1760 mm
1411 mmHeight1430 mm
—Weight1470 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Volvo 960 and 1996 Volvo V70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…