DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Volvo C70 vs 1996 Volvo 960 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C70SpecificationVolvo 960
VolvoMakeVolvo
C70Model960
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Volvo C70SpecificationVolvo 960
7,5 s0–100 km/h—
245 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
225 HPPower190 HP
310 NmTorque280 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C70SpecificationVolvo 960
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption15 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C70SpecificationVolvo 960
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/45 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C70SpecificationVolvo 960
4720 mmLength4871 mm
1820 mmWidth1750 mm
1410 mmHeight1411 mm
1450 KgWeight—
2660 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Volvo C70 and 1996 Volvo 960 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…