1995 • Volvo
960
Volvo 960 2.0 i 16V (190 Hp) 1995Overall Score70.5/100
1995 Volvo 960 vs 1995 Toyota Celica Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Toyota
Celica
Toyota Celica 2.0 Turbo 4WD (ST205) 1995Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Volvo 960
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo 960SpecificationToyota Celica
VolvoMakeToyota
960ModelCelica
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Volvo 960SpecificationToyota Celica
—0–100 km/h6,1 s
210 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
190 HPPower242 HP
280 NmTorque302 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo 960SpecificationToyota Celica
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
15 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo 960SpecificationToyota Celica
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size215/50 R16 V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo 960SpecificationToyota Celica
4871 mmLength4420 mm
1750 mmWidth1750 mm
1411 mmHeight1305 mm
—Weight1390 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2450 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Volvo 960 and 1995 Toyota Celica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…