DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Toyota Celica vs 1995 Volvo 960 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeVolvo
CelicaModel960
1995Model year1995
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

6,1 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
242 HPPower190 HP
302 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/50 R16 VTyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4420 mmLength4871 mm
1750 mmWidth1750 mm
1305 mmHeight1411 mm
1390 KgWeight—
2450 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Toyota Celica and 1995 Volvo 960 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…