DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Volvo 960 vs 1990 BMW M3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo 960SpecificationBMW M3
VolvoMakeBMW
960ModelM3
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Volvo 960SpecificationBMW M3
—0–100 km/h7,5 s
210 km/hTop speed228 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement2302 cc
190 HPPower195 HP
280 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo 960SpecificationBMW M3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
15 ltUrban consumption12,5 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
—Average consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo 960SpecificationBMW M3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo 960SpecificationBMW M3
4871 mmLength4345 mm
1750 mmWidth1680 mm
1411 mmHeight1370 mm
—Weight1360 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2565 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Volvo 960 and 1990 BMW M3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…