DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 BMW M3 vs 1990 Volvo 960 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW M3SpecificationVolvo 960
BMWMakeVolvo
M3Model960
1990Model year1990
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW M3SpecificationVolvo 960
7,5 s0–100 km/h—
228 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2302 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
195 HPPower190 HP
230 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW M3SpecificationVolvo 960
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption15 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW M3SpecificationVolvo 960
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW M3SpecificationVolvo 960
4345 mmLength4871 mm
1680 mmWidth1750 mm
1370 mmHeight1411 mm
1360 KgWeight—
2565 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 BMW M3 and 1990 Volvo 960 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…