DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Volvo 940 vs 1990 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo 940SpecificationOpel Omega
VolvoMakeOpel
940ModelOmega
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo 940SpecificationOpel Omega
9,6 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
190 km/hTop speed222 km/h
2849 ccEngine displacement2969 cc
170 HPPower177 HP
240 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo 940SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption15,5 lt
8,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo 940SpecificationOpel Omega
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo 940SpecificationOpel Omega
4871 mmLength4770 mm
1750 mmWidth1760 mm
1411 mmHeight1480 mm
1475 KgWeight1460 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Volvo 940 and 1990 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…