DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Opel Omega vs 1990 Volvo 940 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 940
OpelMakeVolvo
OmegaModel940
1990Model year1990
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 940
10,5 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
222 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2969 ccEngine displacement2849 cc
177 HPPower170 HP
240 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 940
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
15,5 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,8 lt
10,1 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 940
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears3
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 940
4770 mmLength4871 mm
1760 mmWidth1750 mm
1480 mmHeight1411 mm
1460 KgWeight1475 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Opel Omega and 1990 Volvo 940 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…