1997 • Volvo
940
Volvo 940 2.3i Turbo (165 Hp) 1997Overall Score64.5/100
1997 Volvo 940 vs 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Alfa Romeo
156
Alfa Romeo 156 2.4 JTD (136 Hp) 1997Overall Score63.75/100
WINNER
Volvo 940
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–63.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo 940SpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
VolvoMakeAlfa Romeo
940Model156
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo 940SpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
9,1 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
210 km/hTop speed203 km/h
2316 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
165 HPPower136 HP
264 NmTorque304 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo 940SpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption8,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo 940SpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 VTyre size205/60R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo 940SpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
4871 mmLength4430 mm
1750 mmWidth1745 mm
1411 mmHeight1415 mm
1385 KgWeight1350 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2595 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Volvo 940 and 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…