DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Mitsubishi Space Gear vs 1997 Volvo 940 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Gear

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
Space GearModel940
1997Model year1997
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,1 s
150 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2350 ccEngine displacement2316 cc
128 HPPower165 HP
206 NmTorque264 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption—
10,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R14Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4655 mmLength4871 mm
1695 mmWidth1750 mm
1855 mmHeight1411 mm
1815 KgWeight1385 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Mitsubishi Space Gear and 1997 Volvo 940 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Gear leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…