DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Buick Regal vs 1997 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Regal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–66.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeHolden
RegalModelCommodore
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3813 cc
203 HPPower177 HP
305 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank0 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4 HydramaticGears5
215/70 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4983 mmLength4861 mm
1847 mmWidth1794 mm
1438 mmHeight1448 mm
1600 KgWeight—
2769 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Buick Regal and 1997 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…