DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Holden Commodore vs 1997 Buick Regal Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Regal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeBuick
CommodoreModelRegal
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
3813 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
177 HPPower203 HP
320 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4 Hydramatic
205/65 R15 HTyre size215/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4983 mm
1794 mmWidth1847 mm
1448 mmHeight1438 mm
—Weight1600 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2769 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Holden Commodore and 1997 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…