DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Volvo 940 vs 1990 Mazda 929 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 929

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo 940SpecificationMazda 929
VolvoMakeMazda
940Model929
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats6
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo 940SpecificationMazda 929
10,2 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed181 km/h
2316 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
155 HPPower127 HP
203 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo 940SpecificationMazda 929
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,4 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo 940SpecificationMazda 929
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/70 R14 91 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo 940SpecificationMazda 929
4871 mmLength4690 mm
1750 mmWidth1695 mm
1425 mmHeight1427 mm
—Weight1300 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Volvo 940 and 1990 Mazda 929 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 929 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…