DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Volvo 940 vs 1990 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo 940SpecificationGeo Storm
VolvoMakeGeo
940ModelStorm
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Volvo 940SpecificationGeo Storm
12,5 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
173 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1986 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
111 HPPower130 HP
158 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo 940SpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank47 lt
13,4 ltUrban consumption13 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo 940SpecificationGeo Storm
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo 940SpecificationGeo Storm
4871 mmLength4150 mm
1750 mmWidth1695 mm
1425 mmHeight1300 mm
1370 KgWeight1010 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Volvo 940 and 1990 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…