1996 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0i 4X4 (136 Hp) 1996Overall Score62.25/100
1996 Ford Mondeo vs 1996 Volvo 850 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Volvo
850
Volvo 850 2.0 (143 Hp) 1996Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo 850
FordMakeVolvo
MondeoModel850
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats4+1
5Doors5
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo 850
198 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement2000 cc
136 HPPower143 HP
180 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo 850
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo 850
4631 mmLength—
1749 mmWidth—
1442 mmHeight—
1405 KgWeight—
2704 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Ford Mondeo and 1996 Volvo 850 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…