DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Volvo 850 vs 1996 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Sm-x

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo 850SpecificationHonda Sm-x
VolvoMakeHonda
850ModelSm-x
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeMinivan
4+1Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo 850SpecificationHonda Sm-x
240 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2000 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
143 HPPower140 HP
0 NmTorque186 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo 850SpecificationHonda Sm-x
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption8,62 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,35 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo 850SpecificationHonda Sm-x
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo 850SpecificationHonda Sm-x
—Length3935 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1735 mm
—Weight1370 Kg
—Wheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Volvo 850 and 1996 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Sm-x leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…