1996 • Volvo
850
Volvo 850 2.0 (143 Hp) 1996Overall Score61.5/100
1996 Volvo 850 vs 1996 Ford Mondeo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0i 4X4 (136 Hp) 1996Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo 850SpecificationFord Mondeo
VolvoMakeFord
850ModelMondeo
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
4+1Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo 850SpecificationFord Mondeo
240 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2000 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
143 HPPower136 HP
0 NmTorque180 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo 850SpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank61 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo 850SpecificationFord Mondeo
—Length4631 mm
—Width1749 mm
—Height1442 mm
—Weight1405 Kg
—Wheelbase2704 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Volvo 850 and 1996 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSNissan Presea vs Volvo 8501996 and 1996 model yearsImage unavailableVSHyundai Grandeur/Azera vs Volvo 8501996 and 1996 model yearsImage unavailableVSToyota Mark II vs Volvo 8501996 and 1996 model yearsImage unavailableVSHonda Sm-x vs Volvo 8501996 and 1996 model yearsVSFord Mondeo vs Volvo 8501996 and 1996 model yearsComments are loading…