DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Volvo 850 vs 1995 Fiat Croma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 850

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo 850SpecificationFiat Croma
VolvoMakeFiat
850ModelCroma
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo 850SpecificationFiat Croma
11,7 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
195 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
126 HPPower94 HP
170 NmTorque200 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo 850SpecificationFiat Croma
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
73 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo 850SpecificationFiat Croma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo 850SpecificationFiat Croma
4660 mmLength4520 mm
1761 mmWidth1760 mm
1415 mmHeight1430 mm
1365 KgWeight1240 Kg
2665 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Volvo 850 and 1995 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 850 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…