DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Honda Sm-x vs 1995 Volvo 850 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 850

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda Sm-xSpecificationVolvo 850
HondaMakeVolvo
Sm-xModel850
1996Model year1995
MinivanBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Honda Sm-xSpecificationVolvo 850
7,2 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
131 HPPower126 HP
186 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Honda Sm-xSpecificationVolvo 850
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank73 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption—
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda Sm-xSpecificationVolvo 850
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Honda Sm-xSpecificationVolvo 850
3950 mmLength4660 mm
1695 mmWidth1761 mm
1750 mmHeight1415 mm
1330 KgWeight1365 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2665 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Honda Sm-x and 1995 Volvo 850 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 850 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…