2002 • Buick
Regal
Buick Regal 3.8 V6 (197 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
2002 Buick Regal vs 2000 Holden Commodore Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Holden
Commodore
Holden Commodore 3.8 i V6 (200 Hp) 2000Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Buick Regal
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Buick RegalSpecificationHolden Commodore
BuickMakeHolden
RegalModelCommodore
2002Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Buick RegalSpecificationHolden Commodore
—0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
197 HPPower200 HP
298 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Buick RegalSpecificationHolden Commodore
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Buick RegalSpecificationHolden Commodore
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4 HydramaticGears5
225/60 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Buick RegalSpecificationHolden Commodore
4983 mmLength4884 mm
1847 mmWidth1842 mm
1438 mmHeight1450 mm
1564 KgWeight1550 Kg
2769 mmWheelbase2788 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Buick Regal and 2000 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…