DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2002 Buick Regal Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Regal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeBuick
Range RoverModelRegal
2001Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3900 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
190 HPPower197 HP
0 NmTorque298 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears4 Hydramatic
—Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4983 mm
—Width1847 mm
—Height1438 mm
—Weight1564 Kg
—Wheelbase2769 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Land Rover Range Rover and 2002 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…