1997 • Buick
Regal
Buick Regal 3.8 V6 (197 Hp) 1997Overall Score64.5/100
1997 Buick Regal vs 1997 Ford Thunderbird Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Ford
Thunderbird
Ford Thunderbird 3.8 i V6 (141 Hp) 1997Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Ford Thunderbird
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Buick RegalSpecificationFord Thunderbird
BuickMakeFord
RegalModelThunderbird
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2
Performance
Buick RegalSpecificationFord Thunderbird
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
197 HPPower141 HP
298 NmTorque292 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Buick RegalSpecificationFord Thunderbird
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank72 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,2 ltAverage consumption12 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Buick RegalSpecificationFord Thunderbird
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4 HydramaticGears4
225/60 R16Tyre size205/70 R15 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Buick RegalSpecificationFord Thunderbird
4983 mmLength5088 mm
1847 mmWidth1847 mm
1438 mmHeight1333 mm
1564 KgWeight1619 Kg
2769 mmWheelbase2870 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Buick Regal and 1997 Ford Thunderbird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Thunderbird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…