DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Ford Thunderbird vs 1997 Buick Regal Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Thunderbird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeBuick
ThunderbirdModelRegal
1997Model year1997
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
141 HPPower197 HP
292 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
12 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4 Hydramatic
205/70 R15 HTyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5088 mmLength4983 mm
1847 mmWidth1847 mm
1333 mmHeight1438 mm
1619 KgWeight1564 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2769 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Ford Thunderbird and 1997 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Thunderbird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…