1991 • Volvo
480 E
Volvo 480 E 1.7 Turbo (122 Hp) 1991Overall Score61.5/100
1991 Volvo 480 E vs 1991 Mazda Cronos Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1991 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 2.0i 16V 4WD (125 Hp) 1991Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Mazda Cronos
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo 480 ESpecificationMazda Cronos
VolvoMakeMazda
480 EModelCronos
1991Model year1991
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Volvo 480 ESpecificationMazda Cronos
220 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1761 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
122 HPPower125 HP
0 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo 480 ESpecificationMazda Cronos
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo 480 ESpecificationMazda Cronos
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/65 R14 89 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo 480 ESpecificationMazda Cronos
—Length4695 mm
—Width1770 mm
—Height1400 mm
—Weight1260 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1991 Volvo 480 E and 1991 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…