1991 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 2.0i 16V 4WD (125 Hp) 1991Overall Score62.25/100
1991 Mazda Cronos vs 1991 Volvo 480 E Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1991 • Volvo
480 E
Volvo 480 E 1.7 Turbo (122 Hp) 1991Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Cronos
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CronosSpecificationVolvo 480 E
MazdaMakeVolvo
CronosModel480 E
1991Model year1991
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
4Doors3
Performance
Mazda CronosSpecificationVolvo 480 E
192 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1761 cc
125 HPPower122 HP
173 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CronosSpecificationVolvo 480 E
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CronosSpecificationVolvo 480 E
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 HTyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CronosSpecificationVolvo 480 E
4695 mmLength—
1770 mmWidth—
1400 mmHeight—
1260 KgWeight—
2610 mmWheelbase2650 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1991 Mazda Cronos and 1991 Volvo 480 E approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…