2017 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo Trendline 2017 1.0 80 HPOverall Score53.25/100
2017 Volkswagen Polo vs 2017 Skoda Fabia Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.0 (75 Hp) 2017Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationSkoda Fabia
VolkswagenMakeSkoda
PoloModelFabia
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationSkoda Fabia
15,4 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
171 km/hTop speed172 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement999 cc
80 HPPower75 HP
93 NmTorque95 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationSkoda Fabia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationSkoda Fabia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationSkoda Fabia
4053 mmLength3992 mm
1751 mmWidth1732 mm
1461 mmHeight1467 mm
1125 kgWeight1055 Kg
351 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2470 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Volkswagen Polo and 2017 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…