DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Skoda Fabia vs 2017 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeVolkswagen
FabiaModelPolo
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,7 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
172 km/hTop speed171 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement999 cc
75 HPPower80 HP
95 NmTorque93 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank40 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
175/70 R14Tyre size15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3992 mmLength4053 mm
1732 mmWidth1751 mm
1467 mmHeight1461 mm
1055 KgWeight1125 kg
—Luggage capacity351 lt
2470 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Skoda Fabia

No additional feature records are available.

Volkswagen PoloDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRDriver Fatigue DetectionComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsLight SensorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Skoda Fabia and 2017 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…