2017 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo Trendline 2017 1.0 80 HPOverall Score53.25/100
2017 Volkswagen Polo vs 2017 Skoda Citigo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Skoda
Citigo
Skoda Citigo 1.0 (75 Hp) 2017Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationSkoda Citigo
VolkswagenMakeSkoda
PoloModelCitigo
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationSkoda Citigo
15,4 s0–100 km/h13,9 s
171 km/hTop speed171 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement999 cc
80 HPPower75 HP
93 NmTorque95 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationSkoda Citigo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank35 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationSkoda Citigo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationSkoda Citigo
4053 mmLength3563 mm
1751 mmWidth1641 mm
1461 mmHeight1478 mm
1125 kgWeight932 Kg
351 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2420 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Volkswagen Polo and 2017 Skoda Citigo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…