DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Buick Regal vs 1990 Ford Aerostar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Aerostar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeFord
RegalModelAerostar
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
3135 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
162 HPPower147 HP
251 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank79 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption16 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4 HydramaticGears5
205/70 R15Tyre size205/75 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4917 mmLength4440 mm
1842 mmWidth1820 mm
1346 mmHeight1850 mm
1470 KgWeight1530 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase3020 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Buick Regal and 1990 Ford Aerostar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…