1990 • Ford
Aerostar
Ford Aerostar 3.0i V6 (147 Hp) 1990Overall Score65.25/100
1990 Ford Aerostar vs 1990 Buick Regal Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Buick
Regal
Buick Regal 3.1 V6 (162 Hp) 1990Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Ford Aerostar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford AerostarSpecificationBuick Regal
FordMakeBuick
AerostarModelRegal
1990Model year1990
MinivanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2
Performance
Ford AerostarSpecificationBuick Regal
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement3135 cc
147 HPPower162 HP
224 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford AerostarSpecificationBuick Regal
PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank62 lt
16 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption10,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford AerostarSpecificationBuick Regal
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4 Hydramatic
205/75 R14Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford AerostarSpecificationBuick Regal
4440 mmLength4917 mm
1820 mmWidth1842 mm
1850 mmHeight1346 mm
1530 KgWeight1470 Kg
3020 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Ford Aerostar and 1990 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…