DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Buick Regal vs 2000 Buick Regal Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Regal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeBuick
RegalModelRegal
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2980 ccEngine displacement2980 cc
172 HPPower172 HP
256 NmTorque256 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank64 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4940 mmLength4940 mm
1845 mmWidth1845 mm
1440 mmHeight1440 mm
1550 KgWeight1550 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Buick Regal and 2000 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…