DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volkswagen Sharan vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMazda
SharanModel323
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,4 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
172 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
110 HPPower114 HP
235 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4620 mmLength4200 mm
1810 mmWidth1705 mm
1730 mmHeight1410 mm
1665 KgWeight1115 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volkswagen Sharan and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…