DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 323 vs 2000 Volkswagen Sharan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeVolkswagen
323ModelSharan
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h16,4 s
194 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
114 HPPower110 HP
161 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4620 mm
1705 mmWidth1810 mm
1410 mmHeight1730 mm
1115 KgWeight1665 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 323 and 2000 Volkswagen Sharan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…