DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volkswagen Sharan vs 2000 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeFord
SharanModelMondeo
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

16,4 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
172 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
110 HPPower115 HP
235 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank61 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4620 mmLength4480 mm
1810 mmWidth1750 mm
1730 mmHeight1430 mm
1665 KgWeight1225 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volkswagen Sharan and 2000 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…