DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volkswagen Sharan vs 2000 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeFord
SharanModelFocus
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

16,4 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
172 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
110 HPPower115 HP
235 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
—Average consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4620 mmLength4152 mm
1810 mmWidth1698 mm
1730 mmHeight1430 mm
1665 KgWeight1125 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volkswagen Sharan and 2000 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…