DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volkswagen Sharan vs 2000 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Sharan

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeKia
SharanModelOptima
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h—
194 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower149 HP
210 NmTorque193 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4615 mmLength4745 mm
1810 mmWidth1815 mm
1728 mmHeight1420 mm
1650 KgWeight1335 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volkswagen Sharan and 2000 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Sharan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…