DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Perodua Bezza vs 2017 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Bezza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeVolkswagen
BezzaModelPolo
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,3 s
0 km/hTop speed173 km/h
998 ccEngine displacement999 cc
68 HPPower75 HP
91 NmTorque95 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
36 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption6,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
175/65 R14Tyre size14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4150 mmLength3972 mm
1620 mmWidth1682 mm
1510 mmHeight1453 mm
865 KgWeight1050 kg
—Luggage capacity280 lt
2455 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Volkswagen PoloDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Perodua Bezza and 2017 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Bezza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…